How to open up personal future horizon?

Sep 15, 2010 12:07 PM by Jarno M. Koponen - Comments: 15

How do we make sense of our futures? How do we experience the presence of multiple possible futures? Does the variety of potential alternative futures overwhelm us, or is it so that we can’t even begin to comprehend their existence?

Potential of everyday maybes

Haruki Murakami writes in his novel Pinball, 1972: “The past and the present, we might say, ‘go like this.’ The future is a ‘maybe’.”

Human beings are making predictions all the time. We are constantly surrounded by “maybes” but we can handle them quite fluently, even casually. As neuroscientist Chris Frith puts it: “…my brain can predict what signals my eyes and ears should be receiving… My brain is continuously and automatically predicting the best movements for the actions I might need to perform.”

One could say that our perception of reality is itself a prediction. We see what we expect to see. Our experienced reality is a personal and subjective model of reality that we create – both consciously and “unconsciously”. The same applies to more complex behavior such as social interaction. We seek to understand each other’s thoughts by creating predictive models based on the learned effects of our interactions. All the while, we are constantly testing our predictions by action and simulation. In many ways our predictions, expectations and intentions are guided by our prior hypotheses, models that make “our actions happen to us”.

It is fascinating to think of the enormous (infinite?) amount of everyday “maybes”, that go completely unrecognized and unnoticed, and thus never become anything at all. Most of the time, we are not much bothered about the future of our day-to-day existence. Regular routines and abiding models help consolidate our sense of control. Because of them, we feel comfort that we can more easily predict (and deal with) what happens next and what the future will be like.

Nano-, micro- and macro-futures

Nano-futures, micro-futures and macro-futures

We operate constantly in nano-, micro- and macro-future spaces. Nano-future predictions are made by our brain even though we are not consciously aware of them. Micro-futures, along with macro-futures comprise our personal observable and recognizable future horizon.

NANO- FUTURES
Our brain is embedded with models of our everyday routines and actions. The brain predicts possible nano-future states of our environment and ourselves in everything we do (e.g. when picking up a pencil, keeping the balance when riding a bike, mastering the choreography of eating while talking to a colleague during lunch). Nano-future predictions happen automatically. They don’t necessarily require conscious thinking, yet they are fundamental building blocks of our effortless existence.

MICRO- FUTURES
Micro-futures are consciously comprehended possible future states. They require a level of recognition and assessment on our behalf. They can include activities and events that we anticipate to happen at certain time interval (i.e. second, minute, hour, day). Micro-future predictions usually require conscious thinking and reflection even though we might be acting according to a strong and familiar behavioral pattern.

Social interaction consists of both nano- and micro-future predictions. In social interactions we anticipate things even when we are not conscious of it. Nano-future predictions affect everything from our body language, to our facial expressions and vocal intonations. On the other hand, we also construct more complex predictive mental models of others to convey our message or when we try to understand another person. We then use these models to, for example, empathize and communicate more effectively.

MACRO- FUTURES
Personal macro-futures span longer periods that consist of multiple wider scale events and developments. Macro futures can include longer term plans for attaining some goal or executing a plan (e.g. learning a desired special skill). Personal macro-futures can be seen as superstructures of our future-thinking that orient our longer-term expectations.

By enhancing our awareness of possible futures, we can open up the future horizon for creative and reflective thinking

Nano-futures belong to the realm of unconscious. They are something, that we can’t consciously affect without extra effort. Micro- and macro-futures can be affected by our conscious activities. By enhancing our awareness of possible alternative micro- and macro-futures, we can open up the future horizon for creative and reflective thinking. To do this, we need to enhance our methods to make micro- and macro-futures more observable.

Opening the future

Even though our brains are the most powerful of all prediction engines, we still adapt behaviors that help limit our need to contemplate all possible alternative micro- and macro-futures. While this is an effective coping mechanism, it inherently leads to a bias of seeing only the futures that are already familiar to us. However, if we were able to better exercise and fine-tune our ‘futures understanding’, it would empower us to become more aware of the things that really affect our futures in the present. We could discover new things about ourselves and the world around us, and could more proactively shape our future through the present. Simply put, we could make better and more sustainable decisions.

So how can we enhance our ability to recognize alternative futures, to see beyond day-to-day routines and familiar models? How could we use the information flows around us to explore our possible micro- and macro-futures? How to expand personal future horizon? We need to be actively bombarded with alternatives that challenge our models of subjective reality. Alternative futures can be exposed when we confront surprising things or recognize previously unnoticed factors of our everyday life.

Today’s digital technologies and virtual realities can offer us new ways to explore personal futures. Using interactive analysis process (e.g. data mining, natural language processing), predictive computing, adaptive interfaces and personal digital information it has become possible to provide new insights about our micro- and macro-futures (current technologies don’t allow us to enter the realm of nano-futures without obtrusive devices).

Today’s digital technologies and virtual realities can offer us new ways to explore personal futures

In the same way as our brain simulates actions and creates models to predict the future, we could use digital technologies to simulate personal futures. These predictive digital simulations would thus expand our own simulation capacity. Future-oriented digital applications – using our personal and social information – could provide tangible and comprehensible cues about the future. They could enable discovering new relevant and interesting things, people, places and events, both in the internet and in the real world.

By extending the simulation capacity of our brain we can open up the future horizon in new inspiring and playful ways. Future-oriented and human-centered virtual spaces could let us safely explore and reflect our alternative futures in our own time and rhythm. We would be in control even though we would go beyond the familiar. And thus we would become more aware of the alternatives, the everyday maybes that have so far remained unnoticed and unexplored. By realizing the potential of everyday maybes, the exploration of personal futures could hopefully be turned into a rich resource that helps us to build and develop a more sustainable, ethical and open-minded world.

How do you open up your future horizon? Or how would you use predictive technologies and interfaces to enhance your perception of possible futures?

(Jarno M. in Twitter ilparone)

Comment [15]

Gabriel Shalom

Sep 15, 02:45 PM

This analysis is helpful. It’s interesting to see the increasing relevance of personal futures as related to the implosion of the industrial economic paradigm into the knowledge economic paradigm.

Big corporations of the last 100 years have always had a large stake in predicting the future and could do so because the industrial era technology for futures prediction (research, consulting, analysis, trends) was affordable for these large entities.

Now with the power each of us has in our mobile computers we may become capable of processing our own personal futures.

A dilemma which I think has a real practical and somewhat geeky potential would be an application that would allow you to statistically predict the likelihood of how re-tweetable a tweet is before you tweet. Ha!

CoCreatr

Sep 15, 05:35 PM

Reading this post, I felt prickly anticipation building. Nano futures could be useful, see Monica Anderson about that. http://syntience.com/videos_science_reduct.html

Augmenting the personal event horizon and broadening perception, that might be something.

And then sweet contemplation grew into a micro-meditation. As I let go of all thought and the mind went silent I realized the best future is the one do not foresee (imagination limited by self-fulfilling filtering habits) but the one I create, out of the moment.

On the other hand, how can reductionist algorithms exceed what is designed into them?

So I wonder how proficiency would improve by nano, micro, macro augmenting and simulation. If this is like taking flying lessons after a few dozen hours in the simulator, I’m in.

Jarno M. (Futureful)

Sep 15, 10:24 PM

@Gabriel Good point! This means that we have now unique chances to make more sense about the information flows around us. However, we still need to empower the individual with appropriate tools.

About geeky potential: we would definitely need to go beyond statistical relevance… Rather than providing one perfect solution or calculations of possible success rate, the system should provide insights about possible alternative solutions (e.g. tweet variations). In the end, you make the choice (and create the perfect tweet), not the algorithm nor the AI. Maybe. :)

@CoCreatr Thanks for the inspirational insights and link! Exactly, we need to be able to choose our personal futures, to be empowered to make them happen. Even the most powerful algorithm without a proper context of use is ineffectual.

The augmented personal future horizon is a way to improve our chances to utilize the potential around (and in) us. In my opinion we should create solutions that adapt to ourselves. Their use wouldn’t thus require extra effort or special skills. Most certainly flying lessons without sim, I’d say. :)

Daniel Durrant

Sep 17, 07:52 PM

This is one hell of an opener to future-thinking Tammenlehva (I love your youtube name!).

Simulation is a powerful model of (re)presentation that attracts powerful memes.

RE: statistics, AI, & algorithms: They could be excellent forms of “predictive digital simulations”.

These simulations need to be ethical. I think there is great merit in quantifying our selves (our emotional, cognitive, and biological processes) and I expect databases these forms of intelligence becoming very useful with respect to mitigating information hazards. There needs to be a way that uploaders (hyper-sharing-type-folk)are reimbursed for their efforts. There cannot be exploitation.

Also, access to ones own future forcast should be about as fuzzy as a palm reading, except that the simulation continually re-adjusts and nudges you in new directions. I must admit that “integral” software that includes ancient wisdom along with modern intelligence is preferred.

My mentors at Open Intelligence feel the same way and curation of knowledge artifacts is vital for our “survivance” (a postmodern version of survival that includes the preservation of indigenous lifeways and languages).

I think building virtual spaces as 3d emotional and cognitive cartographies of collective intelligence, could visually supply us with shared understandings of macro-futures. Working in these simulations with clumsy AI versions of ourselves or as I actually prefer to call them, our “pets” could be a way of both expanding our collective “futureful” horizons and breaking down the unconscious barriers of bias within.

I Amp’d this clip here http://ddrrnt.amplify.com/2010/09/16/climb-how-to-open-up-personal-future-horizon-15sep10/

I also left a private video comment at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZM5u301A0

Anyone who wants access can contact me. I’m still building confidence, optimism, and trust, with respect to the #junto and revolving players.

Jarno M.

Sep 18, 09:35 AM

Daniel, thank you for the enlightening remarks! Food for thought. (Names and little gifts make difference.) :)

The ethical aspect is very important. This requires transparency and openness at various levels both when it comes to the user experience, system logic and information management (guiding principals of the system design and its execution). On the other hand, the individual is responsible of the “actualizing” effects of the future simulations.

We must start from very simple to be able to create truly human-centered predictive discovery engine. Predictive discoveries could be seen as future narratives that also connect us to our personal and collective histories (cause-effect-emergent). The purpose of these discoveries would be to strengthen and enrich an individual’s connection to her own and shared realities and their alternatives. Empowering happens through this interaction, the emerging loop of self-expression and “augmented” self-reflection.

(Without seeing an alternative we are always partly blinded/paralyzed.)

Many thanks for sharing your thoughts!

Mogulmxl

Sep 21, 05:11 PM

Human beings are living in fictional present times: our reality is made of stories of other men and what we actually see as our environment is a narrative matrix. Economical constrictions required us to pick a up a story and play that role in order to fulfil the labour requested by that function. Now we are liberated by these constrictions because they are not anymore strictly required. We can deploy our narrativity. Therefore I’m gladly welcoming any predictive prosthesis that can fuel my imagination of alternative roles.
Indeed we are more overwhelmed by material to construct alternative narrations than predictive actions: we haven’t yet developed advanced games of alternative future. Clearly it’s critical to understand the dangers for a mind to deploys itself in multiple possible future. But we are already living in multiple environments and human mind is already spread in cultural habitats.We need to elaborate a predictive technology, that includes tools and the way to use them (that is to say: a new version of a human mind).
Predictive tools could be for minds what freeing hands with standing was for the brain.

Jarno M. (Futureful)

Sep 22, 08:09 PM

Thanks for your thoughts Mogulmxl. New paths are opening up through the dialogue. :)

As you say, narratives are essential to our existence. Self can be seen as a virtual gravitational center of personal and collective narratives and their interpretations. Our perception/experience of self consists of narratives about “self as me” and “self as other”. These narratives are continuously transforming through our daily interactions, self-expression and self-reflection.

Fixed (usually context-specific) roles still help us adapt to the world. However, these roles have become more ambiguous and more flexible. For example, through digital existence we can have roles that are not necessarily bound to our social status, wealth, physical appearance etc.

By being able to explore our alternative futures, we can also explore our roles and vice versa.

ossi kuittinen

Sep 23, 10:10 AM

Everything which opens our space of possible futures is welcome in current society where we lack vision and alternatives both as a sustainable society and as individuals.
The ultimate aim of technology must not be merely the enhancement of biological functioning but the increase of the goodness of human living and the actualization of the higher needs of human beings. Seminal to this thinking is the imminent change in people’s role in the economy from a consumer role of the industrial age to that of an active, creative participant in a post-industrial information society. For example, services in both the public and private sector should be designed free from limiting fixations on sector-specific technocratic solutions that only automate administration and disconnect people from human interaction. Rather, technology is to support all that is considered integral to a naturally fulfilling human existence.
Jarno how should we introduce this e.g. in our education system?

Basar Önal

Sep 24, 03:58 PM

Thank you for the insightful article Jarno.
It’s helpful for to distinguish between ‘futures,’ not just a general future. As a designer, I benefited from a similar kind of reasoning, especially dealing with issues around sustainability. I think your effort is valuable in terms of building up a vocabulary (for us designers, as well as technologists, etc, and possibly policy-makers) about predictions and assumptions on ‘futures.’ Design has been making several attempts at bridging a certain gap between the daily/mundane and the future(in the general sense). However, these attempts usually end up in dystopian/utopian visions—there’s nothing wrong with them, but I am more interested in what you named ‘nano-futures.’ I think that would be a sweet spot for anyone working with persuasive design and futures studies.

George Por

Sep 25, 08:01 PM

Jarno, the direction of your research resonates with my own musings about personal futures (2006). See: http://www.community-intelligence.com/blogs/public/2006/08/chance_and_choice_experiences.html

Let me know when can sign up for testing FutureSelf… :-)

george

Jarno M. (Futureful)

Sep 26, 02:10 PM

Thank you Ossi, human-centered approach is a key for creating more sustainable society.

“The ultimate aim of technology must not be merely the enhancement of biological functioning but the increase of the goodness of human living and the actualization of the higher needs of human beings.”

I totally agree. We can focus on enhancing/enabling self-actualization by supporting critical human-centered design approach and open dialog. Technologies should be made personal and adaptive from their design process to their specific applications.

The systemic changes happen only by increasing awareness about the appropriate alternative approaches, methods and techniques. It requires open discussion in various levels of society and open-minded spokespersons that are willing to challenge the existing monopolies and standards also in practice.

The question is, how can we find, activate and support these people/communities (in specific sectors e.g. education system) that can make the change happen?

- –

Much appreciated Basar! I believe we need to constantly develop human-centered language and approach to create design methods and techniques that can benefit an individual and her community. This happens only through continuous dialog. Thus, like you say, we might be able to go beyond dystopias and utopias and focus on the possible (and tangible) futures of an individual.

- –

George. Thank you for the pointer and interest, you’re deep in this space.

The first step toward augmented personal futures is to create simple applications that enhance our ability/increase the possibility to recognize meaningful future signals (chances) and thus discover new things about ourselves and our surroundings.

I will let you know as soon as possible when we’ll be launching Futureful (closed beta). :)

wildcat

Sep 27, 01:15 PM

A very interesting and stimulating take Jarno, thank you. (as an aside I think you should publish this post in the Polytopia project)

A few points though, by extending the simulation capacity of our brains we also open ourselves to a kind of loop of unconscious self influence, referring specifically to the already validated fact that our past decisions influence our future perspectives and eventual decisions\choices (see here: Automatic Mental Associations Predict Future Choices of Undecided Decision-Makers:http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/321/5892/1100
In many cases what you have termed ‘maybes’ are actually paths of least interference already taken by the subconscious and not yet aware (or reflected) by immediate consciousness and therefore are not really open to being alternatives as such. The issue of us being in control as you point in the last paragraph and the issue of safety are my main concerns here, since the very desire to control and be safe in one’s motion of exploration may stifle the very innovation and freshness we are looking for.

Jarno M. (Futureful)

Sep 28, 09:38 AM

Thank you Wildcat, it’s exciting to hear your thoughts. And many thanks for pointing out the article (a quote below).

“Decision-makers sometimes have already made up their mind at an unconscious level, even when they consciously indicate that they are still undecided.”

While processing the available information we still can never be aware of all the factors affecting either our thought process or actual decisions (e.g. the so-called tacit knowledge). “Maybes” can also be related to very concrete things such as: am I going to take a bus to work or go by bike, am I going to buy local food or something that has been imported overseas etc. How do we make sense of these alternatives/choices and their consequences?

I’m intrigued by the question: would we choose differently, if we knew more about 1) the alternative choices and 2) about the consequences of our choices. Would we become more aware of our own needs, motivations, intentions and goals? Would it be possible to “deepen” and open our self-reflection and future thinking process (i.e. expose the loop of unconscious self influence)?

Like you point out, the balance between control and exploration is a delicate one. How do we make serendipity happen? This is something that we should explore and experiment with. However, I believe that by “shedding light” to the unknown through cues and contextual information, we might become more explorative (feed our curiosity) when it comes to our personal micro- and macro-futures.

(I’m planning to post this essay in Polytopia too) :)

Monica Anderson

Oct 14, 11:16 AM

Jarno,

Jos CoCreatorin linkki mieletti niin ehkä myöskin pitäisit minun videoista (sajtti on videos.syntience.com). Tuntikaupalla pohdittavaa. Videot käsittävät eniten tekoälyä ja tutkimusfilosofiaa. Ennustusta käsittelen vain Artificial-Intuition sajtilla.

Lahjaksi voit mennä YouTubille ja jos haet sieltä “Icosatetraped” niin löydät lyhyen videon minun rakentamasta robotista. Rakensin sen vain huvin vuoksi. Ei siinä tippaakaan tekoälyä ole.

[ Just showing off what little Finnish I still remember ]

Monica

Jarno M. (Futureful)

Oct 19, 10:26 AM

Thanks for sharing Monica, I will take a look. Very interesting (especially the concept of artificial intuition)! And your Finnish looks pretty good too. :)